The SantaBlog Series, Day 18. (How Santa Became What We Know Today)

THE SANTABLOG SERIES

DAY 18

Press play before you scroll.
This feels like the right place to start.

When Santa Needed a Face

For a long time, Santa existed in a loose, almost unfinished way. Not as one clear figure, but as a collection of ideas. Different countries pictured him differently. Different households told the story differently. Sometimes he arrived early December, sometimes Christmas Eve. Sometimes he wore fur, sometimes he wore brown, green, or whatever the local imagination decided.

And that worked, until the world changed.

The late nineteenth century did something quietly radical to everyday life. People moved into cities. Communities grew bigger but less personal. Printing became cheap. Images could travel further than stories ever had. Suddenly, culture needed things to be recognisable at a glance.

That is where Santa began to shift.

Not because anyone sat down and decided to reinvent him, but because the modern world needed symbols that worked fast. You had shop windows instead of village squares. Department stores instead of local markets. Newspapers instead of oral storytelling. If Santa was going to survive in that world, he needed a face people could recognise instantly.

So artists stepped in.

Illustrations began appearing in magazines and postcards. Santa was drawn as warmer, friendlier, more human. Less distant. Less severe. Less unpredictable. He smiled more. He softened. He looked like someone you would actually let into your home.

This was not about selling yet. Not really. It was about reassurance.

Industrial life was hard. Long hours. Child labour. Poverty that sat alongside growing wealth. Christmas, which had once been uneven and sometimes bleak, started to become a moment people actively clung to. A pause. A promise that warmth and generosity still mattered in a world that was becoming increasingly mechanical.

Santa became the carrier of that promise.

He shifted from being a moral figure to an emotional one. Less about judgement, more about comfort. Less about behaviour, more about belonging. That change was subtle, but it was everything. A strict figure can survive in stories. A comforting one survives in homes.

By the early 1900s, Santa was no longer drifting. He was being gently guided.

Department stores realised that Christmas worked better when it felt safe and joyful. Children mattered more to the season now, because childhood itself was being redefined. Santa became approachable. Someone children could meet. Sit with. Talk to. A character rather than a concept.

And here is the important part, this did not strip Santa of meaning. It concentrated it.

For the first time, millions of people were seeing roughly the same Santa. Not identical, but close enough that the image stuck. That shared understanding is what turned Santa from a local tradition into a cultural constant.

This is where people often jump straight to cynicism. They see shops, adverts, and public appearances and assume corruption. As if something pure was suddenly stolen and sold. But that skips over a crucial truth.

Nothing survives unchanged.

Traditions either adapt or they fade. Santa adapted because people needed him to. He became warmer because the world was colder. He became friendlier because life was harsher. He became familiar because familiarity is comforting when everything else is moving too fast.

This was not the birth of commercial Santa yet.
This was the groundwork.

Before the branding.
Before the slogans.
Before Coca Cola ever entered the conversation.

Santa was already becoming modern, because modern life demanded it.

And once that door was open, the rest followed naturally.

Print, Postcards, and the First Mass Santa

Before Santa became something you could walk past in a shopping centre or see looping on a screen, he became something far quieter and far more powerful. He became repeatable.

The explosion of print in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries changed how ideas moved. Newspapers, illustrated magazines, greeting cards, and postcards meant images could travel faster than families ever could. Stories were no longer shaped only by who told them. They were shaped by what people saw, again and again.

Santa slipped neatly into that space.

Early illustrations did not arrive with a rulebook. Artists interpreted him through their own lens, borrowing bits from folklore, bits from winter imagery, bits from whatever would feel comforting to the reader holding the page. Sometimes he looked tall and thin, sometimes round and heavy. Sometimes he wore red, sometimes brown, sometimes muted greens. The details varied, but the direction did not.

He was becoming approachable.

What mattered was not accuracy. It was consistency of feeling. Santa needed to look kind. Familiar. Safe. He needed to look like someone you trusted without really knowing why. That is how images work when they settle into culture. They bypass logic and land straight in the chest.

Postcards played a huge role here. They were cheap, personal, and massively popular. People sent them to family, friends, neighbours. Santa appeared in scenes of domestic warmth, peering through windows, arriving in snowy streets, sitting by fireplaces. He was no longer distant or holy. He was close. Almost intrusive, but in a welcome way.

This was not yet heavy-handed advertising. It was gentler than that. More social than commercial. The images carried values rather than products. Togetherness. Generosity. Childhood wonder. The idea that Christmas happened indoors now, in homes, not just churches.

That shift matters.

Because once Santa moved fully into the home, he became part of family life rather than religious observance. Not instead of it, but alongside it. You could still attend church. Still believe deeply. Still teach the story of Jesus. But Santa became the part of Christmas that everyone shared, regardless of what they believed when the lights went out.

Department stores noticed, but they did not invent this moment. They responded to it.

Large stores were new spaces. Public but intimate. Places people visited not just to buy, but to experience. Santa appearances worked because they reflected what families already felt. Children wanted to see him. Parents wanted the magic preserved just a little longer. Shops simply provided the stage.

This is where people often start to bristle. The moment Santa steps into a commercial space, the accusation of corruption follows quickly. But that ignores how mutual this relationship was. Commerce did not hijack Santa. It amplified him.

And amplification changes things.

Once Santa became visible in public spaces, he needed to behave predictably. He needed a stable personality. Friendly. Gentle. Never frightening. He became less mysterious and more reliable. The wild edges were sanded down, not to weaken him, but to make him safe for everyone.

That is how mass culture works. Sharp ideas become rounded. Complex figures become approachable. Not because they are empty, but because they are shared.

By the time the early twentieth century rolled on, Santa had crossed an invisible line. He was no longer a collection of regional interpretations. He was becoming a standard. Not fixed yet, but close enough that people across countries recognised the same figure.

And recognition is everything.

Once people recognise something, they defend it. They repeat it. They pass it on without thinking about where it came from. Santa became tradition not because he was old, but because he was familiar. Because he showed up in the same places, doing the same things, year after year.

Print did that. Postcards did that. Shop windows did that.

They did not cheapen Santa. They anchored him.

This was the moment where Santa stopped being shaped mainly by storytellers and started being shaped by audiences. By what made people smile. By what made children feel safe. By what made winter feel manageable.

And it set the stage for the next shift. The one that had nothing to do with printing presses or postcards, and everything to do with belief, belonging, and who Christmas was really for.

That is where things get more complicated.

A Season Bigger Than Belief

For a long time, Christmas had a clear centre. It was rooted in the story of Jesus being born, told and retold through scripture, sermons, and tradition. For those who believed, that story still mattered deeply. It still does. But as society changed, Christmas began to carry more weight than any single belief system could comfortably hold.

By the early twentieth century, Britain and much of Europe were no longer culturally uniform. People moved for work. Communities blended. Faith became more personal, less assumed. Churches remained, but attendance shifted. Belief stopped being something you automatically shared with your neighbours and became something you carried quietly, or not at all.

Christmas did not disappear because of that. It expanded.

The problem, if you can call it that, was visibility. The story of Jesus is sacred, but it is also specific. It asks for belief. It asks for context. It asks for a shared understanding that not everyone had anymore. As Christmas became a public season rather than a purely religious one, it needed a figure who could exist in shared spaces without asking difficult questions.

Santa fitted that need almost perfectly.

He carried generosity without doctrine. Kindness without instruction. Joy without expectation. You did not need to believe in him in a theological sense for him to work. You only needed to recognise him. That made him adaptable in a way religious imagery could never be, especially in shop windows, schools, workplaces, and streets where everyone was supposed to feel included.

This is where the balance shifted.

Christmas did not stop being about Jesus for those who held that belief. But the public face of Christmas began to lean towards something broader. Santa became the bridge between private faith and public celebration. He allowed Christmas to be shared without being diluted.

That mattered more than people often realise.

A society does not replace sacred stories lightly. It layers over them. It creates parallel meanings that allow people to coexist. Santa did not erase the nativity. He stood beside it. One belonged to the church and the home. The other belonged to the street, the shop, the classroom, the office.

And once Santa took on that role, commerce followed naturally.

Commercialisation did not happen because businesses were evil or calculating. It happened because Santa was usable. He could appear without causing offence. He could sell without preaching. He could represent generosity while also sitting comfortably next to a price tag. That is not cynical. It is practical.

A cross on a shop window sends a message. Santa sends an invitation.

That difference explains almost everything about how Christmas evolved.

As fewer people felt anchored to a single shared faith, Christmas needed a figure who could hold the season together. Santa became the social glue. A character that children loved, adults tolerated, and businesses could work with without backlash.

He was not chosen by committee. He emerged through repetition and convenience. Through what worked. Through what felt safe. Through what allowed people to celebrate without explaining themselves.

That is how traditions survive in modern societies. Not by enforcing meaning, but by allowing it.

Santa’s rise as the dominant public symbol of Christmas was not an attack on belief. It was a response to diversity. A way of saying this season is for everyone, regardless of what you believe when the lights go out and the house goes quiet.

And in making Christmas bigger than belief, Santa became something else entirely.

He became unavoidable.

That set the stage for the final transformation. The moment when Santa stopped just reflecting culture and started being shaped deliberately, carefully, and consistently.

That is where the red suit finally locks into place.

Why Santa Had to Be Friendly

Once Santa became the public face of Christmas, his personality mattered as much as his image. Possibly more. A figure that appears in homes, schools, shop windows, and public spaces cannot afford to be ambiguous. He has to be safe. Predictable. Gentle in a way that does not demand anything from you.

Earlier versions of Santa, and his regional cousins, were not always like that. Some were stern. Some carried consequences. Some existed to remind children of behaviour rather than comfort them. That kind of figure works in folklore. It does not work in modern shared culture.

Modern life is already heavy enough.

By the time Santa settled into his role as a universal character, the world had been through industrial hardship, war, and rapid social change. Childhood itself was beginning to be protected rather than hurried through. People wanted Christmas to feel like a shelter from the rest of the year, not a continuation of it.

So Santa softened.

He smiled more. He laughed. He became rounder, warmer, visibly indulgent. The message shifted quietly but decisively. Santa was no longer watching to judge. He was arriving to give. Behaviour became secondary to belonging. You did not earn Christmas anymore. You were allowed into it.

That shift explains why modern Santa feels so emotionally safe.

A friendly Santa does not frighten children. He does not divide adults. He does not carry moral threat. He reassures. He signals that this part of the year is about gentleness, generosity, and pause. Even the language around him changed. Naughty and nice became playful, not punitive. A wink rather than a warning.

This was not accidental. It was necessary.

A harsher Santa could not survive in schools and department stores. He could not sit in a grotto with hundreds of nervous children. He could not become a photo opportunity. Safety became the priority, because safety creates trust, and trust keeps traditions alive.

And here is the part that often gets missed.

Friendliness did not make Santa shallow. It made him usable.

A friendly figure can cross boundaries. He can exist in secular spaces without tension. He can be welcomed by families who believe deeply, families who believe differently, and families who believe nothing at all. He does not ask to be taken seriously. He asks to be enjoyed.

That makes him incredibly resilient.

When people criticise Santa for being too soft, too commercial, too diluted, they are usually imagining a purity that would not have survived the modern world. A stricter, more demanding figure would have been pushed to the margins. Santa stayed central because he adapted.

And adaptation is not betrayal. It is survival.

By becoming friendly, Santa became flexible. He could absorb humour. He could absorb branding. He could appear in adverts without losing his core meaning, because that meaning had already shifted away from instruction and towards emotion.

He was there to make people feel something, not believe something.

That emotional role is why Santa could later be shaped so consistently. Once his personality was locked in, his appearance followed. The laugh, the warmth, the generosity. Those traits needed a visual language that matched them.

And that is where the final layer is added.

Not invention, but refinement.

Not corruption, but control.

The version of Santa we recognise today did not arrive with a bang. He arrived through repetition, through comfort, and through a careful narrowing of who he needed to be in order to work everywhere, for everyone.

Which brings us to the moment most people point to first, even though it comes last.

The moment the image stops drifting and starts to settle.

Coca Cola, Consistency, and Control

By the time Coca Cola entered the story, Santa was not a blank canvas. He already existed. He already had a personality, a role, and a growing visual language. What he did not yet have was consistency. Not the kind that stretches across decades and borders, fixing an image so firmly that it becomes unquestioned.

That is what Coca Cola provided.

In the 1930s, advertising was no longer just about products. It was about lifestyle, mood, and familiarity. Coca Cola did not invent Santa’s red suit, despite how often that claim gets repeated. Red was already in circulation. So was the beard, the warmth, the roundness, the laughter. What Coca Cola did was choose one version and repeat it relentlessly.

And repetition is powerful.

Through illustrated campaigns, Santa was shown as cheerful, approachable, human-sized, and comfortably domestic. He drank a Coke. He rested. He laughed. He belonged indoors, among people, not drifting at the edges of folklore. Year after year, the same Santa appeared, doing the same things, wearing the same colours, carrying the same expression.

Over time, variation disappeared.

This is where control enters the conversation, and it is not necessarily a dirty word. Cultural consistency creates shared memory. When millions of people see the same image across years, it becomes familiar. Familiarity turns into tradition far faster than history ever could.

Coca Cola understood something simple and important. If Santa was going to be everywhere, he needed to be recognisable instantly. No confusion. No regional drift. No reinterpretation. The image had to lock.

And it did.

That lock-in effect is why people feel so strongly about modern Santa. He does not feel like one interpretation among many. He feels like the original, even though he is not. Memory works backwards like that. What we grow up with feels ancient, even when it is relatively recent.

It is easy to see this as theft. As if a corporation reached into culture and took something that did not belong to them. But that framing misses the mutual nature of what happened. Santa was already public property. Coca Cola did not claim ownership. They reinforced what people were already leaning towards.

And they did it well.

This did not hollow Santa out. It stabilised him. It allowed him to survive mass media, television, film, and eventually the internet without fracturing into endless versions. The Santa we recognise today works on a billboard, in a children’s book, in a film, and in a shop window because his identity is clear.

That clarity has a cost, of course.

When an image becomes fixed, imagination narrows. The wild edges disappear. Alternative versions fade. But the trade-off is longevity. A figure that can be recognised everywhere can also be passed on everywhere.

This is why blaming Coca Cola alone misses the point. They did not create demand. They responded to it. They did not invent Santa. They standardised him.

And in doing so, they turned Santa into something that could survive the modern world without fragmenting.

The question that remains is whether that survival came at the expense of meaning.

Or whether, in a strange way, it protected it.

That is where this story needs to end. Not with outrage or nostalgia, but with an honest look at what we gained, and what we did not actually lose.

Small disclaimer before anyone sharpens their pitchforks
This post is not endorsed by Coca Cola.
No cans were provided.
No sponsorship money changed hands.
I just find cultural history interesting and Santa happens to drink a lot of imaginary beverages.

What We Gained, and What We Didn’t Lose

By the time you reach the modern version of Santa, it is tempting to feel conflicted. To look at the branding, the repetition, the commercial weight of it all and wonder whether something meaningful was traded away in the process. Whether a season rooted in belief, generosity, and quiet reflection became too loud, too busy, too polished.

That reaction makes sense. It comes from care, not cynicism.

But it also assumes that meaning is fragile. That it can only survive in one form, untouched, unadapted, frozen in time. History rarely works that way. Traditions that refuse to bend tend to disappear. The ones that last learn how to carry their core ideas into new shapes.

Santa did exactly that.

What we gained was a shared language. A figure that could exist in a crowded, diverse, complicated world without asking people to explain themselves. Santa allowed Christmas to remain visible in public life even as private belief became more varied. He made space for joy without permission slips. For generosity without obligation.

He became a shorthand for warmth.

And in doing so, he took some of the pressure off the season. Not everything had to be solemn or sacred to be meaningful. Not every act of kindness needed a theological explanation. Giving could be simple. Joy could be playful. Wonder could be allowed to exist without being interrogated.

That is not nothing.

What we did not lose, despite the fears, was the deeper heart of Christmas. People still gather. Still give. Still reflect. Still feel that strange pull towards generosity that arrives in December whether you ask for it or not. Churches are still full for those moments that matter. Families still tell the story of Jesus in their own homes, in their own way.

Santa did not replace that. He sat alongside it.

And perhaps that is why the season endures at all.

Because Christmas now works on layers. The public and the private. The sacred and the social. The belief you hold quietly and the warmth you share openly. Santa carries the visible weight so that the quieter meanings can remain personal, protected from debate and demand.

It is easy to criticise the industry of Christmas. Some of that criticism is deserved. But it is worth remembering that the figure at the centre of it all was shaped as much by people as by profit. By what families wanted. By what children needed. By what made winter feel survivable.

Santa is not hollow because he is familiar. He is familiar because he works.

He reminds us to be generous without being told how. To slow down without being instructed. To look out for each other without being watched. In a world that measures everything, that kind of reminder matters.

So when you see Santa this year, in all his standardised, overexposed, endlessly repeated glory, it is worth holding two thoughts at once.

Yes, he is a product of modern culture.
And yes, he still carries something real.

Because behind the image, behind the adverts, behind the noise, the message has not changed nearly as much as people think.

Be kind.
Give what you can.
Make the cold a little warmer for someone else.

If that is the price of a red suit and a friendly smile, it might not be such a bad trade after all.

🎅THEPLAINANDSIMPLEGUY🎅

THANK YOU FOR READING PEEPS, MAKE SURE TO FOLLOW OR SUBSCRIBE TO THE EMAILS. LIKE, COMMENT AND SHARE WHEREVER YOU CAN, INTRODUCE YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS AND HAVE A WANDER AROUND MY WEBSITE, CHECK OUT MY OTHER BLOGS AND PAGES, AND PLEASE I BEG YOU KEEP COMING BACK.

👉BUY ME A COFFEE/DONATE👈

Thank you

To get in contact (either just for a chat or to discuss a guest blog, one off or a regular thing) contact me at any of the below links.

IF YOU HAVEN’T ALREADY, PLEASE SUBSCRIBE (BELOW) TO GET AN EMAIL EVERYTIME I POST A NEW BLOG, JUST SO YOU DON’T MISS ANYTHING.